RSS

Warren Buffet on taxing the rich NYT Op-Ed

15 Aug

OUR leaders have asked for “shared sacrifice.” But when they did the asking, they spared me. I checked with my mega-rich friends to learn what pain they were expecting. They, too, were left untouched.

While the poor and middle class fight for us in Afghanistan, and while most Americans struggle to make ends meet, we mega-rich continue to get our extraordinary tax breaks. Some of us are investment managers who earn billions from our daily labors but are allowed to classify our income as “carried interest,” thereby getting a bargain 15 percent tax rate. Others own stock index futures for 10 minutes and have 60 percent of their gain taxed at 15 percent, as if they’d been long-term investors.

These and other blessings are showered upon us by legislators in Washington who feel compelled to protect us, much as if we were spotted owls or some other endangered species. It’s nice to have friends in high places.

Last year my federal tax bill — the income tax I paid, as well as payroll taxes paid by me and on my behalf — was $6,938,744. That sounds like a lot of money. But what I paid was only 17.4 percent of my taxable income — and that’s actually a lower percentage than was paid by any of the other 20 people in our office. Their tax burdens ranged from 33 percent to 41 percent and averaged 36 percent.

If you make money with money, as some of my super-rich friends do, your percentage may be a bit lower than mine. But if you earn money from a job, your percentage will surely exceed mine — most likely by a lot.

To understand why, you need to examine the sources of government revenue. Last year about 80 percent of these revenues came from personal income taxes and payroll taxes. The mega-rich pay income taxes at a rate of 15 percent on most of their earnings but pay practically nothing in payroll taxes. It’s a different story for the middle class: typically, they fall into the 15 percent and 25 percent income tax brackets, and then are hit with heavy payroll taxes to boot.

Back in the 1980s and 1990s, tax rates for the rich were far higher, and my percentage rate was in the middle of the pack. According to a theory I sometimes hear, I should have thrown a fit and refused to invest because of the elevated tax rates on capital gains and dividends.

I didn’t refuse, nor did others. I have worked with investors for 60 years and I have yet to see anyone — not even when capital gains rates were 39.9 percent in 1976-77 — shy away from a sensible investment because of the tax rate on the potential gain. People invest to make money, and potential taxes have never scared them off. And to those who argue that higher rates hurt job creation, I would note that a net of nearly 40 million jobs were added between 1980 and 2000. You know what’s happened since then: lower tax rates and far lower job creation.

Since 1992, the I.R.S. has compiled data from the returns of the 400 Americans reporting the largest income. In 1992, the top 400 had aggregate taxable income of $16.9 billion and paid federal taxes of 29.2 percent on that sum. In 2008, the aggregate income of the highest 400 had soared to $90.9 billion — a staggering $227.4 million on average — but the rate paid had fallen to 21.5 percent.

The taxes I refer to here include only federal income tax, but you can be sure that any payroll tax for the 400 was inconsequential compared to income. In fact, 88 of the 400 in 2008 reported no wages at all, though every one of them reported capital gains. Some of my brethren may shun work but they all like to invest. (I can relate to that.)

I know well many of the mega-rich and, by and large, they are very decent people. They love America and appreciate the opportunity this country has given them. Many have joined the Giving Pledge, promising to give most of their wealth to philanthropy. Most wouldn’t mind being told to pay more in taxes as well, particularly when so many of their fellow citizens are truly suffering.

Twelve members of Congress will soon take on the crucial job of rearranging our country’s finances. They’ve been instructed to devise a plan that reduces the 10-year deficit by at least $1.5 trillion. It’s vital, however, that they achieve far more than that. Americans are rapidly losing faith in the ability of Congress to deal with our country’s fiscal problems. Only action that is immediate, real and very substantial will prevent that doubt from morphing into hopelessness. That feeling can create its own reality.

Job one for the 12 is to pare down some future promises that even a rich America can’t fulfill. Big money must be saved here. The 12 should then turn to the issue of revenues. I would leave rates for 99.7 percent of taxpayers unchanged and continue the current 2-percentage-point reduction in the employee contribution to the payroll tax. This cut helps the poor and the middle class, who need every break they can get.

But for those making more than $1 million — there were 236,883 such households in 2009 — I would raise rates immediately on taxable income in excess of $1 million, including, of course, dividends and capital gains. And for those who make $10 million or more — there were 8,274 in 2009 — I would suggest an additional increase in rate.

My friends and I have been coddled long enough by a billionaire-friendly Congress. It’s time for our government to get serious about shared sacrifice.

Warren E. Buffett is the chairman and chief executive of Berkshire Hathaway.

Advertisements
 
8 Comments

Posted by on August 15, 2011 in Taxes

 

8 responses to “Warren Buffet on taxing the rich NYT Op-Ed

  1. Tom Murphy

    August 18, 2011 at 12:49 pm

    The liberals are asking us to give Obama time.
    We agree…and think 25 to life would be appropriate.
    –Jay Leno

    America needs Obama-care like
    Nancy Pelosi needs a Halloween mask.
    –Jay Leno

    Q: Have you heard about McDonald’s’
    new Obama Value Meal?
    A: Order anything you like
    and the guy behind you has to pay for it.
    –Conan O’Brien

    Q: What does Barack Obama
    call lunch with a convicted felon?
    A: A fund raiser.
    –Jay Leno

    Q: What’s the difference between
    Obama’s cabinet and a penitentiary?
    A: One is filled with
    tax evaders, blackmailers,
    and threats to society.
    The other is for housing prisoners.
    –David Letterman

    Q: If Nancy Pelosi and Obama were on a boat in the middle of the ocean and it started to sink, who would be saved?
    A: America!
    –Jimmy Fallon

    Q: What’s the difference between
    Obama and his dog, Bo?
    A: Bo has papers.
    –Jimmy Kimmel

    Q: What was the most positive result of
    the “Cash for Clunkers” program?
    A: It took 95% of the
    Obama bumper stickers off the road.
    –David Letterman

     
  2. Andrew Pelton

    August 18, 2011 at 2:45 pm

    I don’t get the connection between these jokes and taxing the rich, but okay.

     
  3. vimax capsule

    August 22, 2011 at 2:35 pm

    thank your for your post and the rest. you know..

     
  4. Andrew Pelton

    August 24, 2011 at 6:03 pm

    Thank you for reading!

     
  5. CheapHostingGuide.org

    August 29, 2011 at 5:06 am

    Hello there, simply turned into aware of your blog thru Google, and found that it is really informative. I?m gonna watch out for brussels. I will appreciate if you continue this in future. A lot of other folks will be benefited from your writing. Cheers!

     
  6. vimax

    September 4, 2011 at 11:43 am

    Bravo, your opinion is useful

     
  7. Sträfling Kostüm

    September 11, 2011 at 11:05 pm

    What i do not understood is if truth be told how you are not actually much more well-preferred than you may be right now. You’re very intelligent. You recognize therefore considerably on the subject of this matter, made me personally believe it from numerous various angles. Its like women and men don’t seem to be interested except it is one thing to do with Woman gaga! Your personal stuffs great. Always maintain it up!

     
  8. Pirat Kostüm

    September 11, 2011 at 11:07 pm

    of course like your web-site however you need to check the spelling on several of your posts. A number of them are rife with spelling issues and I in finding it very troublesome to tell the truth nevertheless I?ll certainly come again again.

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: